Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Journal of Dairy Sci...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Cell Content of Goat Milk: California Mastitis Test, Coulter Counter, and Fossomatic for Predicting Half Infection

Authors: Bernard Poutrel; C. Lerondelle;

Cell Content of Goat Milk: California Mastitis Test, Coulter Counter, and Fossomatic for Predicting Half Infection

Abstract

The mean cell count of goat milk collected in early and midlactation from udder halves free of infection was 1404 X 10(3) cells/ml and 614 X 10(3) cells/ml estimated by Coulter Counter and Fossomatic. Arithmetic means of cell count by Fossomatic method for samples within California Mastitis Test scores were similar to results from cow milk. Results by the three methods were closely correlated .7. Means of cell counts were 2858 X 10(3) cells/ml and 1293 X 10(3) cells/ml by Coulter Counter and Fossomatic methods for udder halves harboring coagulase-negative staphylococci and 8946 X 10(3) cells/ml and 4804 X 10(3) cells/ml for halves infected by major pathogens. Of the thresholds examined, 1000 X 10(3) cells/ml was most satisfactory for both Coulter Counter and Fossomatic methods, because it detected about 80% of major infections and gave an acceptable proportion of errors.

Subjects by Vocabulary

Microsoft Academic Graph classification: business.industry Cow milk Animal science medicine.anatomical_structure Coulter counter Immunology Medicine Udder business California mastitis test

Keywords

Bacteriological Techniques, Goats, Cell Count, Mastitis, Staphylococcal Infections, Milk, Pregnancy, Streptococcal Infections, Genetics, Animals, Female, Animal Science and Zoology, Food Science

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    95
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 1%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
  • citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    95
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 1%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    Powered byBIP!BIP!
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
95
Top 10%
Top 1%
Average
moresidebar

Do the share buttons not appear? Please make sure, any blocking addon is disabled, and then reload the page.