Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Anuario ThinkEPIarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Anuario ThinkEPI
Article . 2022 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 1 versions
addClaim

Revisitando el panorama CRIS en España

Authors: Pablo De-Castro;

Revisitando el panorama CRIS en España

Abstract

Como continuación a la nota ThinkEPI de 2019 sobre esta misma materia (De-Castro, 2019), este texto reflexiona sobre las dos principales funciones, en cierta medida contrapuestas entre sí, de los sistemas de gestión de la información científica o CRIS. Éstas son por un lado visibilizar la investigación realizada en una organización como aplicación práctica de la ciencia abierta, y por el otro recoger y almacenar información científica de uso interno para la toma de decisiones basadas en la evidencia. Se argumenta que ambas funciones son complementarias y su puesta en práctica simultánea requiere una eficiente colaboración entre los diversos sistemas (interoperabilidad técnica) y las múltiples áreas institucionales involucradas en la gestión y administración de sistemas CRIS (interoperabilidad humana). El texto examina el panorama CRIS actual en España bajo el prisma de esta doble función y destaca algunos ejemplos de buenas prácticas en materia de colaboración.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Information storage and retrieval systems, 330

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    1
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
1
Average
Average
Average
gold
Related to Research communities