<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
pmid: 3332534
In the 50 years or so since the description by Irving F. Stein and Michael L. Leventhal of their finding of unexpectedly enlarged ovaries in a group of women with amenorrhea1, the syndrome we associate with their names has become widely recognized, variously interpreted and a subject of continual fascination for scores of reproductive scientists and physicians. Many excellent and comprehensive reviews of the subject have been published2–4.The present account is written with the clearly declared bias that women with the Stein-Leventhal syndrome suffer from a primary disturbance of their ovaries and that abnormalities of, say, gonadotropin secretion—and, by implication, of hypothalamic-pituitary function—are secondary to the ovarian lesion and not causal.
Ovary, Humans, Female, Gonadal Steroid Hormones, Polycystic Ovary Syndrome, Ultrasonography
Ovary, Humans, Female, Gonadal Steroid Hormones, Polycystic Ovary Syndrome, Ultrasonography
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 67 | |
popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |