
doi: 10.2523/26610-ms , 10.2118/26610-ms
ABSTRACT This paper describes how the framework developed for universal kriging can accommodate a general formulation of the reservoir history matching problem. We illustrate this framework with simple examples, and then show that the specification of the required covariances and correlations provides an opportunity to introduce explicitly some pertinent reservoir engineering knowledge into history matching. We then briefly consider the elicitation of this information in the form of parameter values in functional forms for covariances, and discuss how the specification of weights can influence calculations, and hence convergence to an optimal history match. We conclude with a review of some of the available diagnostics and a summary on practical applications of the framework.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 2 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
