Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

A New Esophagus

Authors: George D. Zuidema; Marilyn Kitching Klein;

A New Esophagus

Abstract

THE USE OF THE COLON as a replacement for the diseased or injured esophagus has been tried with considerable success recently. For the past five years a series of patients with malignant disease of the upper esophagus have been treated at the Massachusetts General Hospital by techniques involving: esophagectomy followed by radiation therapy and later replacement of the esophagus with a section of the colon. In the case of unresectable lesions, palliative colon bypass alone may be used and sometimes followed by radiation therapy. While the detailed results of this series are not reported here, it has been demonstrated that the use of the colon as a replacement for the diseased esophagus is quite feasible, and the operative procedure may be carried out with a low mortality rate(l1). Of course, the technique, with the exception of the radiation therapy, is equally applicable to benign conditions of the esophagus. Prior to the past two decades surgical approaches to destructive conditions of the esophagus were limited to superficial procedures such as the creation of skin tubes for patients with strictures of the esophagus. In 1935, Ohsawa in Japan reported on the one-stage esophagogastric resection for carcinoma of the lower third of the esophagus with an anastomosis of the gastric remnant to the esophagus below the aortic arch(2). In this country, Adams and Phemister and Churchill and Sweet developed the procedure further until today this technique has become fairly well standardized as the method of choice for lower-third lesions (3,4).

Related Organizations
Keywords

Postoperative Care, Esophagus, Colon, Humans, Postoperative Period

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author? Do you have the OA version of this publication?