
doi: 10.2307/2489889
The Institute's Accounting Principles Board has just added a third Opinion to its output for this year. The first Opinion dealt with reporting net income of commercial banks, the second with accounting for convertible debt and debt issued with stock purchase warrants, and the third with computing earnings per share. Although there were some delays in getting each of these Opinions out, as compared to original time schedules, the fact that they were finalized is cause for satisfaction, because each of the opinions faced strong opposition from various groups. This is not new or surprising, for every subject tackled by the Board is controversial and strong opposition may be expected from some quarter for any position taken. While some financiers and business conglomerators complain about what the Board is doing, many observers are commenting favorably about its work. One syndicated columnist recently wrote an article about the APB entitled, "They Act as Management's Conscience." In it he said:
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
