Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Spiders of Genus Latrodectus

Authors: H. L. Keegan;

Spiders of Genus Latrodectus

Abstract

While several excellent reviews on arachnidism have been published in recent years (Bertin, 1950; Blair, 1934; Bogen, 1926; Greer, 1949; Machiavello, 1949) these have dealt primarily with the clinical problem of spider bite, and have given little information on classification of the poisonous spiders involved. Although differences in toxicity of venoms of various species of Latrodectus have been reported (Keegan, 1950; Shulov, 1948; Vellard, 1936) demonstrations, of common antigenic properties in venoms of L. mactans, L. indistinctus, and L. geometricus by Finlayson and Hollow (1945) indicates need for better understanding of the relationship between members of the genus. In this paper a brief review of the classification of spiders of genus Latrodectus is presented, and criteria for classification are discussed. This paper is based upon a study of the literature and upon examination of specimens from three sources. Specimens of L. hasseltii, L. geometricus, and the several described subspecies of L. mactans were made available by officials of the United States National Museum. Representatives of the same species, as well as L. tredecimguttatus and L. menavodi were obtained from the collections of the American Museum of Natural History through the courtesy of Dr. W. J. Gertsch. In the personal collection of the writer were specimens of L. hasseltii, L. geometricus, and L. mactans. Examples of L. hystrix, L. pallidus, L. indistinctus, L. revivensis, and L. foliatus were not available for study.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    4
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
4
Average
Average
Average
Related to Research communities
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!