
doi: 10.2307/2422183
While several excellent reviews on arachnidism have been published in recent years (Bertin, 1950; Blair, 1934; Bogen, 1926; Greer, 1949; Machiavello, 1949) these have dealt primarily with the clinical problem of spider bite, and have given little information on classification of the poisonous spiders involved. Although differences in toxicity of venoms of various species of Latrodectus have been reported (Keegan, 1950; Shulov, 1948; Vellard, 1936) demonstrations, of common antigenic properties in venoms of L. mactans, L. indistinctus, and L. geometricus by Finlayson and Hollow (1945) indicates need for better understanding of the relationship between members of the genus. In this paper a brief review of the classification of spiders of genus Latrodectus is presented, and criteria for classification are discussed. This paper is based upon a study of the literature and upon examination of specimens from three sources. Specimens of L. hasseltii, L. geometricus, and the several described subspecies of L. mactans were made available by officials of the United States National Museum. Representatives of the same species, as well as L. tredecimguttatus and L. menavodi were obtained from the collections of the American Museum of Natural History through the courtesy of Dr. W. J. Gertsch. In the personal collection of the writer were specimens of L. hasseltii, L. geometricus, and L. mactans. Examples of L. hystrix, L. pallidus, L. indistinctus, L. revivensis, and L. foliatus were not available for study.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 4 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
