
doi: 10.2307/2346807
SUMMARY A comparison is made of methods of generating samples on a computer from the Poisson distribution. The well-known methods of counting the number of occurrences in a Poisson process and of sequentially searching through a table of cumulative probabilities have the disadvantage that the time required increases with thePoisson parameter ft. For fixed ft two modified search procedures are described which remain fast as ft increases. If ft varies from sample to sample the modified search procedures are not directly applicable. But fast methods can be found which use combinations of either modified search method and are appreciably faster than rejection methods.
Poisson random variables, Poisson distribution, computer generation, Monte Carlo methods, Random number generation in numerical analysis, Poisson process
Poisson random variables, Poisson distribution, computer generation, Monte Carlo methods, Random number generation in numerical analysis, Poisson process
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 31 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
