Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Karyological Affinities of the Species Groups of Silky Pocket Mice (Rodentia, Heteromyidae)

Authors: D. F. Williams;

Karyological Affinities of the Species Groups of Silky Pocket Mice (Rodentia, Heteromyidae)

Abstract

Data on mitotic chromosomes of the 12 species of silky pocket mice ( Perognathus , subgenus Perognathus ) are evaluated in phyletic terms. Five karyotypic groups are recognized. The fasciatus group is composed of P. fasciatus, P. apache , and P. flavescens (2N = 44, FN = 48–50). Members of the flavus group ( P. flavus and P. merriami ; 2N = 50, FN = 86) are most closely related to the longimembris group ( P. longimembris, P. amplus , and P. inornatus ; 2n = 50 and 56, FN = 82–94). The parvus group ( P. alticola, P. parvus , and P. xanthonotus ) has 2N = 54, and FN = 70–104. These four species groups are allied on both karyological and morphological bases. Overall, the parvus group is considered to be the most primitive, but is closer in chromosome structure to the flavus-longimembris phyletic line than to the fasciatus line. The fasciatus group is divergent karyologically, with few apparent similarities to the other members of the subgenus. P. formosus ( formosus group; 2N = 36, FN = 52) appears not to be closely allied with the species of either the subgenera Chaetodipus or Perognathus .

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    14
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
14
Average
Top 10%
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!