
doi: 10.2172/5200499
The stellarator neoclassical transport due to particles trapped in local helical wells is calculated in the low-collisionality regime using a systematic expansion. The behavior of electron transport is found to be the same over a wide range of energies, but the behavior of ion transport for low energy ions is found to be different than that for high energy ions. Furthermore, the electron fluxes do not vary with the change in the radial ambipolar electric field nearly as much as do the ion fluxes. Thus, the particle diffusion is controlled by the electrons. A nonradial ambipolar electric field is induced by ion drift. This electric field enhances the transport by about 15 to 20%. A convenient graphical method that allows one to determine the magnitude of the radial ambipolar field for machines with different parameters is presented. Numerical examples show that electron energy confinement time is comparable to the ion energy confinement time for all the different size stellarators studied. Although the neoclassical losses are large, it is shown that ignition can be achieved in a reasonably sized stellarator reactor. Finally, from the standpoint of reactor economics, the confinement scaling law shows that in order to increase n tau, it is better to increase the aspect ratio than the overall dimensions of the reactor.
Scaling Laws, Electron Drift, Stellarators, Transport Theory 700105* -- Fusion Energy-- Plasma Research-- Plasma Kinetics-Theoretical-- (-1987), Electric Fields, Trapping, 70 Plasma Physics And Fusion Technology, Confinement Time, Neoclassical Transport Theory, Thermonuclear Devices, Closed Plasma Devices
Scaling Laws, Electron Drift, Stellarators, Transport Theory 700105* -- Fusion Energy-- Plasma Research-- Plasma Kinetics-Theoretical-- (-1987), Electric Fields, Trapping, 70 Plasma Physics And Fusion Technology, Confinement Time, Neoclassical Transport Theory, Thermonuclear Devices, Closed Plasma Devices
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
