Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ The Japanese Journal...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
The Japanese Journal of Physiology
Article . 2002 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Convenient Automated Conductance Volumetric System.

Authors: Kazunori, Uemura; Masaru, Sugimachi; Toshiaki, Shishido; Toru, Kawada; Masashi, Inagaki; Can, Zheng; Takayuki, Sato; +1 Authors

Convenient Automated Conductance Volumetric System.

Abstract

Conventional conductance volumetric systems require ex-vivo calibrations for blood conductivity and parallel conductance. It is often impractical to repeat blood sampling and hypertonic saline infusion for these calibrations. To overcome these limitations, we developed a useful, self-calibrating conductance volumetric system that does not require ex-vivo calibrations. On a conventional 6-electrode catheter, we added an extra electrode close to one of the recording electrodes to estimate blood conductivity. These two electrodes were placed close (0.5 mm) enough so that conductance between them reflected only blood conductivity regardless of cardiac volume. We estimated parallel conductance by the dual-frequency excitation (2 and 20 kHz) method. In 18 anesthetized rabbits, blood conductivity (sigma(est)) thus estimated agreed well with that (sigma(conv)) measured by the conventional ex-vivo blood sampling method (sigma(est) = 1.04sigma(conv)-0.25, R(2) = 0.98, SEE = 0.01 mS/cm, 1.2% error). Parallel conductance (G(p est)) estimated by dual-frequency excitation also agreed well with that (G(p conv)) estimated by the saline injection method (G(p est) = 0.95G(p conv)+4.25, R(2) = 0.87, SEE = 4.0 mS, 6.0% error). Estimated ventricular volume (V(est)) by our system agreed reasonably well with that (V(conv)) by the conventional method (V(est) = 0.93V(conv)+0.01, R(2) = 0.86, SEE = 0.22 ml, 14.7% error). The fact that this self-calibrating conductance volumetric system drastically simplifies volume measurement makes it an attractive tool for the assessment of cardiac function where significant changes in blood conductivity and parallel conductance are inevitable, such as in cardiac surgery.

Keywords

Male, Cardiac Catheterization, Cardiac Volume, Electrophysiology, Automation, Coronary Circulation, Pressure, Animals, Ventricular Function, Female, Rabbits

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    4
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
4
Average
Average
Average
bronze