
doi: 10.21464/fi42405
U ovom se tekstu feministička kritika liberalizma razvija preko analize liberalne dihotomije javno – privatno, pojma individue i liberalnog individualizma, pojma formalne jednakosti, apstraktnih modela kao osnove za izgradnju teorija, kao i preko analize zanemarivanja etike i prakse brige. Na temelju ovih razmatranja pokazuje se zašto se u feminističkoj filozofiji liberalizam predstavlja kao rodna i patrijarhalna tradicija, ali se također analiziraju i neki feministički odgovori na feminističke kritike liberalizma koji su razvijeni u cilju prikazivanja liberalne tradicije kao heterogene te kao one koja možda daje mogućnost razvoja radikalnog feminističkog političkog programa. Analizirani pojmovi, kao mjesta glavnih sporova između feminizma i liberalizma, predstavljaju se kao oni koji upravo pokazuju mogućnost ili nemogućnost usvajanja ili redefiniranja ideja liberalizma u feminističkoj filozofiji i promišljanjima promjene svijeta, ali i kao oni koji pokazuju granice liberalnog diskursa u svakom feminističkom pokušaju da se usvoje i/ili redefiniraju pojmovi iz teorija liberalizma.
This article develops a feminist critique of liberalism through analyses of the liberal private-public dichotomy, the concept of the individual and liberal individualism, the concept of formal equality, abstract models as the basis of political theory, and through analyses of the liberal neglect of ethics and the practice of care. These analyses show why feminist philosophy usually presents liberalism as a gendered and patriarchal tradition. On the other hand, the article aims to highlight some of the feminist responses to the feminist critique of liberalism in order to present the tradition as heterogeneous and one that has the potential to develop the radical feminist political programme. The concepts that are the subject of analysis in this article are precisely those that demonstrate the possibility or impossibility of adopting or redefining liberal ideas in feminist philosophy and commitment to social change, but also those that represent the limits of liberal discourse in any feminist attempt to adopt and/or redefine key concepts and ideas from liberal theories.
feminism, apstrakcija, ethics of care, feminizam, javno, etika brige, abstraction, feministička filozofija, liberalism, individualism, individualizam, formalna jednakost, feminist philosophy, private/public, privatno, liberalizam, dualizmi, dualisms, formal equality
feminism, apstrakcija, ethics of care, feminizam, javno, etika brige, abstraction, feministička filozofija, liberalism, individualism, individualizam, formalna jednakost, feminist philosophy, private/public, privatno, liberalizam, dualizmi, dualisms, formal equality
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
