
doi: 10.2139/ssrn.368640
pmid: 15868672
On occasion a conflict arises between a physician's perceived moral obligation not to withhold treatment and a patient's right to refuse treatment. Arguments are cited in support of the position that, with prior notice, the physician's right should prevail. It is further argued that legislative action to remove lingering legal doubt would be appropriate.
Freedom, Refusal to Participate, Value of Life, Nutritional Support, Public Policy, United States, Religion, Treatment Refusal, Withholding Treatment, Physicians, Hospitals, Religious, Personal Autonomy, Humans, Ethics, Medical, Bioethical Issues, Supreme Court Decisions, Conscience
Freedom, Refusal to Participate, Value of Life, Nutritional Support, Public Policy, United States, Religion, Treatment Refusal, Withholding Treatment, Physicians, Hospitals, Religious, Personal Autonomy, Humans, Ethics, Medical, Bioethical Issues, Supreme Court Decisions, Conscience
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
