
Tedarikci secimi firmalar icin kritik oneme sahiptir. En uygun tedarikcinin secilmesi kalitatif ve kantitatif cok sayida faktorun bir arada degerlendirilmesini gerektirdiginden, zor bir surectir. Bu sebeple cok kriterli karar verme yontemleri ile degerlendirme yapilmasi problemin yapisina uygun cozum sunmaktadir. Bu calismada da uygun yesil tedarikci secimi yapilmistir. Problem icin oncelikle yesil tedarikci degerlendirme kriterleri literatur taramasina gore belirlenmis, ardindan uzman gorusune basvurularak bulanik AHS (Analitik Hiyerarsi Sureci) ile kriter agirliklari belirlenmis ve bulanik WASPAS (Butunlesik Agirlikli Toplam ve Carpim) yontemi ile uygun yesil tedarikci secimi yapilmistir.
Engineering, Bulanık AHS;Bulanık WASPAS;Yeşil Tedarikçi seçimi;Yeşil tedarik zinciri, Mühendislik, F-AHP;F-WASPAS;Green Supplier Selection;Green Supply Chain
Engineering, Bulanık AHS;Bulanık WASPAS;Yeşil Tedarikçi seçimi;Yeşil tedarik zinciri, Mühendislik, F-AHP;F-WASPAS;Green Supplier Selection;Green Supply Chain
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 5 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
