
The Red List Index uses information from the IUCN Red List to track trends in the projected overall extinction risk of sets of species. It has been widely recognised as an important component of the suite of indicators needed to measure progress towards the international target of significantly reducing the rate of biodiversity loss by 2010. However, further application of the RLI (to non-avian taxa in particular) has revealed some shortcomings in the original formula and approach: It performs inappropriately when a value of zero is reached; RLI values are affected by the frequency of assessments; and newly evaluated species may introduce bias. Here we propose a revision to the formula, and recommend how it should be applied in order to overcome these shortcomings. Two additional advantages of the revisions are that assessment errors are not propagated through time, and the overall level extinction risk can be determined as well as trends in this over time.
Conservation of Natural Resources, Databases, Factual, Abstracting and Indexing, Science, Wild, Animals, Wild, Extinction, Biological, Birds, Databases, Models, Animals, Factual, Phylogeny, Models, Statistical, Q, R, Extinction, Biodiversity, Statistical, Biological, Abstracting and Indexing as Topic, Medicine, Research Article
Conservation of Natural Resources, Databases, Factual, Abstracting and Indexing, Science, Wild, Animals, Wild, Extinction, Biological, Birds, Databases, Models, Animals, Factual, Phylogeny, Models, Statistical, Q, R, Extinction, Biodiversity, Statistical, Biological, Abstracting and Indexing as Topic, Medicine, Research Article
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 265 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 0.1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
