
doi: 10.1360/012015-41
Various criteria have been proposed to compare and assess fractional factorial designs. Among them the minimum moment aberration criterion is conceptually simple and computationally cheap. However, the power moments in the minimum moment aberration criterion depend on the Hamming distances between two runs, which leads to minimum moment aberration criterion having a few defects. In this paper, we use Lee distance instead of Hamming distance to de ne power moments, and propose the minimum Lee-moment aberration criterion to compare and assess multi-level fractional factorial designs. Some relationships between minimum Lee-moment aberration criterion and other criteria are also studied, which provides a signi cant statistical justi cation of minimum Lee-moment aberration criterion.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 5 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
