<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
doi: 10.13125/ch/4739
Any researcher of philosophy who wants to complete the map of a hypothetical “Anatomy of Thinking” would not feel satisfied only with the detailed study of the discursive elements that we use as the basis of thought. It is also essential to know how the reception and interpretation of philosophical ideas that have traveled within written works have been intertwined throughout history and, in some exceptional cases, in the evanescent presence of orality, always collected by others. In this work I analyze how philosophical works have been interpreted throughout history, or, what is the same, how the history of philosophy has been constructed from the reader’s perspective.
Critical Hermeneutics, N. Special I (2021): PHILOSOPHY TODAY: The Need of Humanities to Build the World of Future
Ethics, BD10-701, BJ1-1725, Speculative philosophy
Ethics, BD10-701, BJ1-1725, Speculative philosophy
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |