
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>pmid: 4589409
SummaryThe available methods of evaluation of an antirheumatic compound in a clinical trial situation are discussed. The techniques of single-blind and double-blind studies are described and their respective merits analysed. Proposed new techniques for the measurement of joint inflammation are reviewed.
Radioisotopes, Clinical Trials as Topic, Erythrocytes, Time Factors, Aspirin, Patients, Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Pain, Blood Sedimentation, Motor Activity, Hand, Arthritis, Rheumatoid, Placebos, Research Design, Thermography, Drug Evaluation, Humans, Joints, Radionuclide Imaging
Radioisotopes, Clinical Trials as Topic, Erythrocytes, Time Factors, Aspirin, Patients, Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Pain, Blood Sedimentation, Motor Activity, Hand, Arthritis, Rheumatoid, Placebos, Research Design, Thermography, Drug Evaluation, Humans, Joints, Radionuclide Imaging
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 15 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
