
pmid: 11790719
To the Editor: Kastrati et al recently reported1 significantly less restenosis with lesions randomized to deployment of one stent design (ACS RX Multi-Link, [ML]) than with a related design (Multi-Link RX Duet, [DT]) from the same manufacturer (Guidant). They attributed the difference in restenosis to the difference in strut thickness. Although the two stent designs do differ significantly in strut thickness, there are other differences in design and mechanical properties that might impact on restenosis. The DT has greater radial strength: when tested in vitro in a pressure chamber, the DTs collapsed at a higher pressure (1.81±0.01 atm) than the MLs (0.77±0.03 atm, P <0. 05) (unpublished observations). Some experimental data suggest that greater stent hoop strength may cause increased neoimtimal proliferation.2 The extent of metal coverage of vessel wall is greater for the ML …
Graft Occlusion, Vascular, Humans, Stents, Mechanics
Graft Occlusion, Vascular, Humans, Stents, Mechanics
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 3 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
