Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Digestionarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Digestion
Article . 1990 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology
Article . 1989 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
Digestion
Article . 1991
versions View all 4 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

The Clinical Safety of Omeprazole

Authors: L. Sölvell;

The Clinical Safety of Omeprazole

Abstract

This review comprises data from more than 19,000 individuals who have taken part in clinical studies of omeprazole. Isolated, non-specific adverse events which might be attributable to omeprazole have included nausea, dizziness, headache and diarrhoea. These events have been generally mild and transient and have not usually required either a reduction of dose or cessation of therapy. The frequency and spectrum of adverse events have been the same in those over 65 years of age as in younger patients. No drug-related adverse events have been found in patients with renal insufficiency or severe liver failure. More than 1.2 million patient treatments of omeprazole have now been given. The overall incidence of adverse events with omeprazole is low, and in comparative studies has been in the same range as that found with H2-receptor antagonists. Importantly, no dose-related adverse events have been observed with omeprazole in the dose range 10-60 mg/day. Furthermore, none of the serious adverse events that have been reported have been attributable to omeprazole. No histological changes in oxyntic endocrine cells have been found after short-term periods of treatment with either omeprazole or H2-receptor antagonists in patients with peptic ulcer disease. Long-term continuous high-dose omeprazole treatment of patients with Zollinger-Ellison syndrome has not induced any significant increase in the oxyntic endocrine cell hyperplasia. Investigations of the gastric mucosa from patients in a compassionate use programme who have received omeprazole, usually 20 mg daily, for periods of up to 37 months, have been performed. Two hundred and forty-eight patients had their last biopsy taken after at least 11 months of treatment.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Keywords

Zollinger-Ellison Syndrome, Clinical Trials as Topic, Peptic Ulcer, Liver Function Tests, Product Surveillance, Postmarketing, Humans, Thyroid Function Tests, Cimetidine, Ranitidine, Esophagitis, Peptic, Omeprazole

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    89
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 1%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
89
Average
Top 1%
Top 10%
Related to Research communities
Upload OA version
Are you the author? Do you have the OA version of this publication?