Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Pediatric Neurosurge...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Reoperation for Chiari Malformations

Authors: David, Sacco; R Michael, Scott;

Reoperation for Chiari Malformations

Abstract

<i>Background:</i> We undertook this study to characterize those patients who required reoperations for Chiari malformation and to determine whether modifications in surgical technique at the initial procedure might have obviated the need for repeat surgery. <i>Methods:</i> We reviewed the hospital records, imaging studies, operative reports, and follow-up data of those patients who were undergoing a second operation as part of a consecutive series of Chiari decompressions carried out by one neurosurgeon over a 14-year period. We wished to determine whether type of Chiari malformation, age at initial surgery, the presence of associated bony anomalies, or initial operative technique contributed to the need for reoperation. <i>Results:</i> Twenty-two (17%) of the surgical procedures represented reoperations (16 of 100 Chiari I and 6 of 33 Chiari II decompressions). Of the patients in the series who were operated on at age 5 years or younger, 7 (16%) were reoperations (5 of 33 Chiari I and 2 of 10 Chiari II decompressions); 15 patients (17%) of those older than 5 years at surgery were reoperations (11 of 67 Chiari I and 4 of 23 Chiari II decompressions). 8 of the 16 patients who underwent reoperations for Chiari I malformation and 4 of the 6 patients who underwent reoperations for Chiari II malformation had their initial decompression surgery at age 5 years or younger. Reoperation was required because of failure to treat adequately an associated syrinx (n = 11), because of persisting neurological symptoms or headache (n = 9), or because of a possible faulty fourth ventricular stent placement (n = 2). 5 of 9 patients in the operative series with Chiari malformations associated with craniosynostosis represented reoperations (55%), and all 3 of the patients whose syrinx persisted after reoperation had craniosynostosis syndromes. <i>Conclusions:</i> Approximately 17% of the patients with Chiari I and Chiari II malformations in this operative series were undergoing a second operation. Factors in this series which were associated with reoperation included a young age at initial surgery, the presence of complex bony anatomy at the foramen magnum, syndromic craniosynostosis, and failure of the surgeon at the initial operation either to assess patency of the foramen of Magendie or correctly place a fourth ventricular stent.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Male, Reoperation, Time Factors, Age Factors, Infant, Neurosurgical Procedures, Syringomyelia, Arnold-Chiari Malformation, Prosthesis Implantation, Child, Preschool, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Humans, Female, Stents, Treatment Failure, Child, Follow-Up Studies, Retrospective Studies

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    76
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
76
Top 10%
Top 10%
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!