
We consider the classic problem of computing the Longest Common Subsequence (LCS) of two strings of length n . The 40-year-old quadratic-time dynamic programming algorithm has recently been shown to be near-optimal by Abboud, Backurs, and Vassilevska Williams [FOCS’15] and Bringmann and Künnemann [FOCS’15] assuming the Strong Exponential Time Hypothesis. This has led the community to look for subquadratic approximation algorithms for the problem. Yet, unlike the edit distance problem for which a constant-factor approximation in almost-linear time is known, very little progress has been made on LCS, making it a notoriously difficult problem also in the realm of approximation. For the general setting, only a naive O ( n ɛ /2-approximation algorithm with running time OŠ ( n 2-ɛ has been known, for any constant 0 < ɛ ≤ 1. Recently, a breakthrough result by Hajiaghayi, Seddighin, Seddighin, and Sun [SODA’19] provided a linear-time algorithm that yields a O ( n 0.497956 -approximation in expectation; improving upon the naive \(O(\sqrt {n})\) -approximation for the first time. In this paper, we provide an algorithm that in time O ( n 2-ɛ ) computes an OŠ ( n 2ɛ/5 -approximation with high probability, for any 0 < ɛ ≤ 1. Our result (1) gives an OŠ ( n 0.4 -approximation in linear time, improving upon the bound of Hajiaghayi, Seddighin, Seddighin, and Sun, (2) provides an algorithm whose approximation scales with any subquadratic running time O ( n 2-ɛ ), improving upon the naive bound of O ( n ɛ/2 ) for any ɛ, and (3) instead of only in expectation, succeeds with high probability.
FOS: Computer and information sciences, Longest common subsequence, Computer Science - Data Structures and Algorithms, Data Structures and Algorithms (cs.DS), F.2.2, approximation algorithms, string algorithms, 68W32, 68W25
FOS: Computer and information sciences, Longest common subsequence, Computer Science - Data Structures and Algorithms, Data Structures and Algorithms (cs.DS), F.2.2, approximation algorithms, string algorithms, 68W32, 68W25
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
