descriptionPublicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article 01 May 2006 English Publisher:WileyJournal:Veterinary Record, volume 158, pages 706-707 (issn: 0042-4900, eissn: 2042-7670,

Authors: Adrian, Wingfield; Hugh, Miller; Nick, Honhold;

doi: 10.1136/vr.158.20.706-a , 10.1136/vr.159.6.187-b , 10.1136/vr.159.19.643-b

pmid: 17088306 , 16891430 , 16714439

FMD control strategies

- Summary
- Subjects
- Metrics

Abstract

Dr Matt Keeling and colleagues comment: The recent paper by [Tildesley and others (2006)][1] considered a range of reactive vaccination policies, control options and epidemiological scenarios, based upon the procedures and logistics outlined in the published DEFRA contingency plan ([DEFRA 2004][2

Keywords

Euthanasia, Animal, Foot-and-Mouth Disease, Vaccination, Animals, United Kingdom, Disease Outbreaks

Impact byBIP!

	selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	3
	popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.	Average
	influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	Average
	impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.	Average