Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Carcinoma in situ

Authors: Nigel, Bundred; J Michael, Dixon;

Carcinoma in situ

Abstract

copyrighted material, used by arrangement with john wiley & sons limited. for personal use only, must not be reproduced or shared with third parties. anyone wishing to reproduce this content in whole or in part, in print or in electronic format, should contact digitalrightsuk@wiley.com browse the abc series at www.wiley.com ### Overview Two main types of non-invasive (in situ) cancer can be recognised from the histological pattern of disease and cell type (Table 1). Ductal carcinoma in situ is the most common form of non-invasive carcinoma, making up 3–4% of symptomatic and 20–25% of screen-detected cancers. It has increased in frequency because of the widespread use of screening mammography (Figure 1). The increase is across all age groups, with a 12% annual increase in the 30–39-year age group and an 18.1% annual increase in women over the age of 50. Ductal carcinoma in situ is characterised by distortion, distention and complete involvement by a similar and neoplastic population of cells of adjacent ducts and lobular units (Figure 2). By contrast, lobular carcinoma in situ, now known as lobular intraepithelial neoplasia (LIN), which incorporates what was previously known as lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS) and atypical lobular hyperplasia (ALH), is rare (<1% of screen-detected cancers) and presents as relatively uniform expansion of the whole lobule by regular cells …

Related Organizations
Keywords

Humans, Breast Neoplasms, Female, Breast, Combined Modality Therapy, Carcinoma in Situ, United Kingdom

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    6
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
6
Average
Average
Average
Related to Research communities
Cancer Research
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!