<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>

COPY SCRIPT

For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eu

Columbium Versus Niobium

Name: Columbium Versus Niobium
Creator: Clarke, F. W.

descriptionPublicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article 01 Jan 1914Publisher:American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)Journal:Science, volume 39, pages 139-140 (issn: 0036-8075, eissn: 1095-9203,

Authors: Clarke, F. W.;

doi: 10.1126/science.39.995.139 , 10.1038/092528b0

pmid: 17780662

Columbium Versus Niobium

- Summary
- Metrics

Abstract

AT a meeting of the council of the International Association of Chemical Societies in Brussels, last September, a committee on inorganic nomenclature, among other recommendations, endorsed the name and symbol “niobium” and “Nb”, for the element which was originally named columbium. As this recommendation is historically erroneous, a brief statement of the facts appears to be desirable.

Impact byBIP!

	citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	4
	popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.	Average
	influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	Average
	impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.	Average