Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Auditory threshold in fishes: Towards international standard measurement procedures

Authors: Michele B. Halvorsen; Michael A. Ainslie;

Auditory threshold in fishes: Towards international standard measurement procedures

Abstract

Fish rely on their auditory system for survival to detect and interpret sounds in their surroundings, especially those originating from predators, prey, and conspecifics. The sensitivity of fish hearing can be impaired, for example, by masking or temporary threshold shifts. To understand and quantify the impact of noise in the oceans, we need a quantitative and comparable understanding of fishes’ impaired and unimpaired hearing sensitivities to sound pressure and sound particle motion. Historically, hearing sensitivities were measured to generate an audiogram for a fish species of interest. Therefore, audiograms are only available for a few individuals representing a few species. Crucially, differences between measurement protocols leave existing audiograms mostly incomparable. The goldfish (Carassius auratus) is a species for which many audiograms have been measured and the reported hearing thresholds exceed a 40 dB spread, largely attributed to differences in methodology rather than in hearing sensitivity [Ladich & Fay, 2013; Maruska & Sisneros, 2016]. These large differences indicate a need to harmonize measurement procedures. Standardization of hearing sensitivity measurements is therefore essential if we are to achieve environmental management goals in the United States, Europe, and worldwide. We propose a path that leads to the development of suitable international standards.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    2
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
2
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!