
doi: 10.1121/1.408330
pmid: 8120249
It has previously been shown [E. M. Burns, K. H. Archart, and S. L. Campbell, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 91, 1575–1581 (1992)] that both the overall prevalence of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions (SOAEs) and most of the various gender- and ear-related prevalence tendencies are not significantly different in 1-month-olds and adults. However, large differences were found between the neonates and adults in the distributions of the frequencies and levels of SOAEs. Both the average level and the median frequency were significantly higher in infants. To obtain longitudinal SOAE data, infants from this original group of 1-month-olds were tested at ages 3, 6, 12, and 24 months. In general, individual SOAEs decrease in level with age, and high-frequency SOAEs tend to show the largest decreases. No substantial shifts occur in the frequencies of individual SOAEs. The frequency and level distributions at 24 months of age are still not adultlike. SOAEs which show short-term instabilities in frequency and/or amplitude at 1 month of age typically continue to evidence such instabilities at later ages. These results suggest the cochlea is adultlike at birth, and imply that the observed SOAE changes reflect developmental changes in the external and middle ear.
Male, Sound Spectrography, Fourier Analysis, Otoacoustic Emissions, Spontaneous, Age Factors, Infant, Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted, Cochlea, Dichotic Listening Tests, Reference Values, Reaction Time, Humans, Female, Longitudinal Studies, Dominance, Cerebral, Pitch Perception
Male, Sound Spectrography, Fourier Analysis, Otoacoustic Emissions, Spontaneous, Age Factors, Infant, Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted, Cochlea, Dichotic Listening Tests, Reference Values, Reaction Time, Humans, Female, Longitudinal Studies, Dominance, Cerebral, Pitch Perception
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 43 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
