Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Longitudinal measurements of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions in infants

Authors: E M, Burns; S L, Campbell; K H, Arehart;

Longitudinal measurements of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions in infants

Abstract

It has previously been shown [E. M. Burns, K. H. Archart, and S. L. Campbell, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 91, 1575–1581 (1992)] that both the overall prevalence of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions (SOAEs) and most of the various gender- and ear-related prevalence tendencies are not significantly different in 1-month-olds and adults. However, large differences were found between the neonates and adults in the distributions of the frequencies and levels of SOAEs. Both the average level and the median frequency were significantly higher in infants. To obtain longitudinal SOAE data, infants from this original group of 1-month-olds were tested at ages 3, 6, 12, and 24 months. In general, individual SOAEs decrease in level with age, and high-frequency SOAEs tend to show the largest decreases. No substantial shifts occur in the frequencies of individual SOAEs. The frequency and level distributions at 24 months of age are still not adultlike. SOAEs which show short-term instabilities in frequency and/or amplitude at 1 month of age typically continue to evidence such instabilities at later ages. These results suggest the cochlea is adultlike at birth, and imply that the observed SOAE changes reflect developmental changes in the external and middle ear.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Male, Sound Spectrography, Fourier Analysis, Otoacoustic Emissions, Spontaneous, Age Factors, Infant, Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted, Cochlea, Dichotic Listening Tests, Reference Values, Reaction Time, Humans, Female, Longitudinal Studies, Dominance, Cerebral, Pitch Perception

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    43
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
43
Average
Top 10%
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!