Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Free-Field Threshold Shift and Temporary Threshold Shift Reduction as Measures of Efficiency of Ear Protective Devices

Authors: J. L. Fletcher; M. Loeb;

Free-Field Threshold Shift and Temporary Threshold Shift Reduction as Measures of Efficiency of Ear Protective Devices

Abstract

The attenuation of two different earplugs and a helmet was measured by a procedure combining the free-field threshold shift and the Békésy threshold tracking methods. Subjects were then exposed to impulse noise which would produce between 12 and 64 dB TTS at 6000 cps unprotected and their TTS was subsequently measured after identical exposure during which they wore the protective devices. Following this the subjects were exposed unprotected to continuous noise which would produce a TTS at 6000 cps within ±6 dB of the TTS they experienced after their unprotected exposure to the continuous noise. Finally, they were exposed to the same continuous noise while wearing the protective devices, and their TTS following exposure was determined. It was found that the helmet afforded significantly less attenuation of low-frequency sound than the ear plugs and roughly the same amount at higher frequencies. The three devices were found to be equally effective in eliminating the TTS following exposure to the continuous and impulsive noise. While the data did not lend themselves to definite conclusions regarding susceptibility to impulse and continuous noise, it appeared that susceptibility to one type of exposure was not necessarily significantly correlated with susceptibility to the other.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    2
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
2
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!