Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Medical Physicsarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Medical Physics
Article . 2002 . Peer-reviewed
License: Wiley Online Library User Agreement
Data sources: Crossref
Medical Physics
Article . 2002
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

C‐Arm imaging for brachytherapy source reconstruction: Geometrical accuracy

Authors: Albert Y C, Fung;

C‐Arm imaging for brachytherapy source reconstruction: Geometrical accuracy

Abstract

We study the accuracy of brachytherapy source reconstruction using C‐Arm images. We use a phantom embedded with dummy ribbons in a regular pattern, placed at the rotation center of the C‐Arm. With a commercial reconstruction jig, radiographic films are taken without the image intensifier. The average error in reconstructed seed coordinates is 0.1 cm. However, the jig is inconvenient for patient procedures. For C‐Arm reconstruction without the jig, the magnifications of the image intensifier along orthogonal directions are different. We “stretch” the image to equalize the magnifications. Afterward, seed reconstruction has an average error of 0.1 cm in all directions.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Phantoms, Imaging, Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted, Brachytherapy, Biophysics, Humans, Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted, Equipment Design, Biophysical Phenomena

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    12
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
12
Average
Top 10%
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!