
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>doi: 10.1117/12.284700
When a reliability test ends in zero units having failed, traditional reliability calculations suggest that the estimated failure rate is also zero, assuming an exponential distribution. However, this is not a realistic estimate of the failure rate, as it does not take into account the number of units on test. In such cases, a reasonable approach is to select a failure rate that makes the likelihood of observing zero failures equal to 50%. In other words, we select a failure rate that carries with it a high probability of observing zero failures for a given reliability test'. In this paper we review this methodology and demonstrate how it has been implemented at Advanced Micro Devices (AMD) through a user friendly EXCEL based software application. Customized software tools such as this have led to increased awareness, productivity, and accuracy in reliability calculations at AMD.
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
