According to Miranda Fricker (2007), a testimonial injustice occurs when someone is not given the credibility they deserve when testifying, due to prejudices about their identity held by their audience. In this paper, I will develop two criticisms of Fricker’s defence of an interpretation of Catharine MacKinnon’s (1994: 9) claim that pornography silences women that conceives of the silencing in question as an extreme form of testimonial injustice.