
doi: 10.1111/nph.12119
pmid: 23495388
SummaryA major goal of evolutionary biology is to understand how diverging populations become species. The evolution of reproductive isolation (RI) halts the genomic homogenization caused by gene flow and recombination, and enables differentiation and local adaptations to become fixed between newly forming species. Selection can favor the strengthening ofRIthrough a process termed reinforcement. Reinforcement occurs when selection favors traits that decrease mating between two incipient species in response to costly mating or the production of maladapted hybrids. Although this process has been investigated more frequently in animals, there is also evidence of reinforcement in plants. There are three strategies for the investigation of the process of reinforcement: case studies of species or diverging taxa; experimental evolution studies; and comparative studies. Here,Idiscuss how all three strategies find evidence consistent with reinforcement occurring in plants.Ifocus largely on case studies, and use research onPhlox drummondiito illustrate the importance of testing alternative hypotheses. Although the existing evidence suggests that reinforcement can occur, further investigations, particularly using large‐scale comparative studies, are needed to determine the importance of reinforcement in plant speciation.
Gene Flow, Reproductive Isolation, Genetic Speciation, Reproduction, Hybridization, Genetic, Plants, Selection, Genetic, Texas
Gene Flow, Reproductive Isolation, Genetic Speciation, Reproduction, Hybridization, Genetic, Plants, Selection, Genetic, Texas
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 178 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% |
