
pmid: 18312492
Abstract: Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) are a frequent cause for hospitalization and occur often in hospitalized patients. The objective of this study was to establish an ADR reporting and monitoring system at a teaching hospital. The pharmacovigilance unit of Masih Daneshvari hospital was established by a clinical pharmacist and a clinical pharmacologist. Healthcare professionals were encouraged to report any suspected ADRs encountered in in‐patients. The incidence, pattern, seriousness, severity and preventability of the reported ADRs were analysed. During the period of 12 months, for 6840 patients, 112 spontaneous reports were received. The most frequently reported reactions were due to anti‐infective agents (58.2%). Ceftriaxone accounted for the highest number of the reported ADRs among anti‐infective agents. The skin and appendages system was the most frequently affected system (32.5% of all reactions). Seventeen per cent of the ADRs were reported as serious reactions. Although the incidence of ADRs reported by physicians and nurses was found to be low, this programme was useful as a preliminary programme in initiating a culture of ADR reporting among healthcare professionals. Improved communication between the physicians and nurses with the pharmacovigilance centre in the hospital is suggested.
Adult, Male, Adolescent, Attitude of Health Personnel, Gastrointestinal Diseases, Communication, Incidence, Infant, Newborn, Infant, Antineoplastic Agents, Iran, Middle Aged, Anti-Infective Agents, Child, Preschool, Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Systems, Humans, Medication Errors, Female, Child, Hospitals, Teaching
Adult, Male, Adolescent, Attitude of Health Personnel, Gastrointestinal Diseases, Communication, Incidence, Infant, Newborn, Infant, Antineoplastic Agents, Iran, Middle Aged, Anti-Infective Agents, Child, Preschool, Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Systems, Humans, Medication Errors, Female, Child, Hospitals, Teaching
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 54 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
