
pmid: 16436082
Objective: To measure and analyse noise levels in the learning–teaching activities at the Dental School of the University of Porto (Portugal).Materials and methods: Sound levels were measured in five different practice areas and laboratories, selected as representative of a variety of learning–teaching activities. The noise levels were determined using a precision sound level meter that was positioned at ear level and at 1 m distance from the operator.Results: The noise levels registered vary between 60 and 99 dB(A) and are similar to the data of other international studies. The results recorded differences in sound levels when the equipment was merely turned on and during cutting operations. Differences between brand new and used equipment were also noted. It appears that hearing damage risk may be lesser amongst dentists who use brand new equipment.Conclusion: The noise levels detected in this study are considered to be close to the limit of risk of hearing loss.
Portugal, Dental Clinics, Laboratories, Dental, Ciências da engenharia e tecnologias::Engenharia civil, Acoustics, Acoustics, Civil engineering, Dental Equipment, Prosthodontics, Dental High-Speed Equipment, Risk Factors, Acústica, Engenharia civil, Engineering and technology::Civil engineering, Noise, Occupational, Humans, Schools, Dental
Portugal, Dental Clinics, Laboratories, Dental, Ciências da engenharia e tecnologias::Engenharia civil, Acoustics, Acoustics, Civil engineering, Dental Equipment, Prosthodontics, Dental High-Speed Equipment, Risk Factors, Acústica, Engenharia civil, Engineering and technology::Civil engineering, Noise, Occupational, Humans, Schools, Dental
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 40 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
