Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao European Journal of ...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
European Journal of Biochemistry
Article . 1992 . Peer-reviewed
License: Wiley Online Library User Agreement
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Subunit interactions of GTP‐binding proteins

Authors: Winchil L.C. Vaz; Peter Gierschik; Margareta Frohlich; Helmuth Heithier; Christian Dees; Emile Schiltz; Martin Baumann; +3 Authors

Subunit interactions of GTP‐binding proteins

Abstract

Fluorescence energy transfer [cf. Förster, T. (1948) Ann. Phys. 6, 55–75] was tested for its suitability to study quantitative interactions of subunits of Go with each other and these subunits or trimeric Go with the β1‐adrenoceptor in detergent micelles or after reconstitution into lipid vesicles [according to Feder, D., Im, M.‐J., Klein, H. W., Hekman, M., Holzhöfer, A, Dees, C., Levitzki, A., Helmreich, E. J. M. & Pfeuffer, T. (1986) EMBO J. 5, 1509–1514]. For this purpose, αo‐ and βγ‐subunits and trimeric Go purified from bovine brain, the βγ‐subunits from bovine rod outer segment membranes and the β1‐adrenoceptor from the turkey erythrocyte were all labelled with either tetramethylrhodaminmaleimide or fluorescein isothiocyanate under conditions which leave the labelled proteins functionally intact. In the case of αo‐ and βγ‐interactions, specific high‐affinity binding interactions (Kd∼ 10 nM) and nonspecific low‐affinity binding interactions (Kd∼ 1 μM) could be readily distinguished by comparing fluorescence energy transfer before and after dissociation with 10 μM guanosine 5′‐O‐[γ‐thio]triphosphate and 10 mM MgCl2 where only low‐affinity binding interactions remained. Interactions between αo‐ and βγ‐subunits from bovine brain or from bovine retinal transducin did not differ much. The βγ‐subunits from bovine brain were found to bind with high transfer efficiency and comparable affinities to the hormone‐activated and the nonactivated β1‐receptor reconstituted in lipid vesicles: Kd= 100 ± 20 and 120 ± 20 nM, respectively; however, βγ‐subunits from transducin appeared to bind more weakly to the β1‐adrenoceptor than βγ‐subunits from bovine brain. Separated purified homologous αo‐ and βγ‐subunits from bovine brain interfered mutually with each other in binding to the β1‐adrenoceptor presumably because they had a greater affinity for each other than for the receptor. These findings attest to the suitability of fluorescence energy transfer for studying protein – protein interactions of G‐proteins and G‐protein‐linked receptors. Moreover, they supported the previous finding [Kurstjens, N. P., Fröhlich, M., Dees, C., Cantrill, R. C., Hekman, M. & Helmreich, E. J. M. (1991) Eur. J. Biochem. 197, 167–176] that βγ‐subunits can bind to the nonactivated β1‐adrenoceptor.

Keywords

Brain Chemistry, Turkeys, Erythrocyte Membrane, Magnesium Chloride, Membranes, Artificial, Rod Cell Outer Segment, Spectrometry, Fluorescence, GTP-Binding Proteins, Guanosine 5'-O-(3-Thiotriphosphate), Receptors, Adrenergic, beta, Animals, Cattle, Micelles, Fluorescent Dyes

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    45
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
45
Average
Top 10%
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!