
doi: 10.1111/emr.12335
handle: 10072/385528 , 11343/284629 , 1885/154262
SummaryMonitoring is essential for effective conservation and management of threatened species and ecological communities. However, more often than not, threatened species monitoring is poorly implemented, meaning that conservation decisions are not informed by the best available knowledge. We outline challenges and provide best‐practice guidelines for threatened species monitoring, informed by the diverse perspectives of 26 conservation managers and scientists from a range of organisations with expertise across Australian species and ecosystems. Our collective expertise synthesised five key principles that aim to enhance the design, implementation and outcomes of threatened species monitoring. These principles are (i) integrate monitoring with management; (ii) design fit‐for‐purpose monitoring programs; (iii) engage people and organisations; (iv) ensure good data management; and (v) communicate the value of monitoring. We describe how to incorporate these principles into existing frameworks to improve current and future monitoring programs. Effective monitoring is essential to inform appropriate management and enable better conservation outcomes for our most vulnerable species and ecological communities.
adaptive management, Social Values, Monitoring, threatened species, Evolution, Science, management cycle, Decision Triggers, populations & communities, 333, 1105 Ecology, 2309 Nature and Landscape Conservation, Behavior and Systematics, veterinary and food sciences, translating science, 580, Agricultural, Ecological Research, Policy and Law, monitoring and evaluation, Australia, Biodiversity, knowledge transfer, Management, conservation management, Environmental sciences, Biological sciences, Knowledge, Policy, 2308 Management, Programs
adaptive management, Social Values, Monitoring, threatened species, Evolution, Science, management cycle, Decision Triggers, populations & communities, 333, 1105 Ecology, 2309 Nature and Landscape Conservation, Behavior and Systematics, veterinary and food sciences, translating science, 580, Agricultural, Ecological Research, Policy and Law, monitoring and evaluation, Australia, Biodiversity, knowledge transfer, Management, conservation management, Environmental sciences, Biological sciences, Knowledge, Policy, 2308 Management, Programs
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 76 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
