
Recent results in compressive sampling have shown that sparse signals can be recovered from a small number of random measurements. This property raises the question of whether random measurements can provide an efficient representation of sparse signals in an information-theoretic sense. Through both theoretical and experimental results, we show that encoding a sparse signal through simple scalar quantization of random measurements incurs a significant penalty relative to direct or adaptive encoding of the sparse signal. Information theory provides alternative quantization strategies, but they come at the cost of much greater estimation complexity.
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 193 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% |
