
We introduce a new equivalence checking method based on abstract BDDs (aBDDs). The basic idea is the following: given an abstraction function, aBDDs reduce the size of BDDs by merging nodes that have the same abstract value. An aBDD has bounded size and can be constructed without constructing the original BDD. We show that this method of equivalence checking is always sound. It is complete for an important class of arithmetic circuits that includes integer multiplication. We also suggest heuristics for findings suitable abstraction functions based on the structure of the circuit. The efficiency of this technique is illustrated by experiments on ISCAS'85 benchmark circuits
FOS: Computer and information sciences, 89999 Information and Computing Sciences not elsewhere classified
FOS: Computer and information sciences, 89999 Information and Computing Sciences not elsewhere classified
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 6 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
