
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>The issue of whether non-Markovianity (NM) could be considered as a resource in quantum information has been a subject of intense debate for the last years. Recently, a simple mechanism was proposed in which one of the main features of NM, the backflow of information from the environment to the system, represents a fundamental and quantifiable resource for generating entanglement within an open quantum system coupled to a finite and small environment [N. Mirkin, P. Poggi and D. Wisniacki, Phys. Rev. A, 99(2), 020301(R)]. In this work, we extend the universality of this resource mechanism by studying a completely different and more general scheme where the system is coupled to an infinite structured reservoir. Under both setups, we show that the degree of NM univocally determines the optimal degree of entanglement reachable by controlling the open system. This result reveals the universality of a quantitative relation between entanglement and NM by using quantum optimal control.
9 pages, 4 figures
Entanglement, Quantum Physics, Control, https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.3, Non-Markovianity, FOS: Physical sciences, Decoherence, https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1, Quantum Physics (quant-ph)
Entanglement, Quantum Physics, Control, https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.3, Non-Markovianity, FOS: Physical sciences, Decoherence, https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1, Quantum Physics (quant-ph)
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 22 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
