Quality control must be maintained at every step of a microarray experiment, from RNA isolation through statistical evaluation. Here we provide suggestions for analyzing microarray data. Because the utility of the results depends directly on the design of the experiment, the first critical step is to ensure that the experiment can be properly analyzed and interpreted. What is the biological question? What is the best way to perform the experiment? How many replicates will be required to obtain the desired statistical resolution? Next, the samples must be prepared, pass quality controls for integrity and representation, and be hybridized and scanned. Also, slides with defects, missing data, high background, or weak signal must be rejected. Data from individual slides must be normalized and combined so that the data are as free of systematic bias as possible. The third phase is to apply statistical filters and tests to the data to determine genes (1) expressed above background, (2) whose expression level changes in different samples, and (3) whose RNA-processing patterns or protein associations change. Next, a subset of the data should be validated by an alternative method, such as reverse transcription–polymerase chain reaction (RT–PCR). Provided that this endorses the general conclusions of the array analysis, gene sets whose expression, splicing, polyadenylation, protein binding, etc. change in different samples can be classified with respect to function, sequence motif properties, as well as other categories to extract hypotheses for their biological roles and regulatory logic.