
doi: 10.1101/839704
Abstract Motivation The genetic mechanisms involved in human diseases are fundamental in biomedical research. Several databases with curated associations between genes and diseases have emerged in the last decades. Although, due to the demanding and time consuming nature of manual curation of literature, they still lack large amounts of information. Current automatic approaches extract associations by considering each abstract or sentence independently. This approach could potentially lead to contradictions between individual cases. Therefore, there is a current need for automatic strategies that can provide a literature consensus of gene-disease associations, and are not prone to making contradictory predictions. Results Here, we present GeDex, an effective and freely available automatic approach to extract consensus gene-disease associations from biomedical literature based on a predictive model trained with four simple features. As far as we know, it is the only system that reports a single consensus prediction from multiple sentences supporting the same association. We tested our approach on the curated fraction of DisGeNet (f-score 0.77) and validated it on a manually curated dataset, obtaining a competitive performance when compared to pre-existing methods (f-score 0.74). In addition, we effectively recovered associations from an article collection of chronic pulmonary diseases, and discovered that a large proportion is not reported in current databases. Our results demonstrate that GeDex, despite its simplicity, is a competitive tool that can successfully assist the curation of existing databases. Availability GeDex is available at https://bitbucket.org/laigen/gedex/src/master/ and can be used as a docker image https://hub.docker.com/r/laigen/gedex Contact cmendezc@ccg.unam.mx Supplementary information Supplementary material are available at bioRxiv online.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
