
pmid: 20019618
Opioids are invaluable in the treatment of moderate-to-severe pain. Unfortunately, their prolonged use may be associated with the onset of opioid-induced hyperalgesia (OIH). This review focuses on recent clinical studies that support or refute the existence of OIH in patients.Whether or not OIH is a clinical reality is an ongoing debate. In recent years, the majority of clinical trials investigating whether chronic-opioid treatment causes paradoxical pain sensations have been conducted in opioid addicts, patients maintained on methadone and human volunteers receiving acute-morphine infusions. That opioid-maintained patients have different nociceptive profiles compared with opioid naïve patients has been both raised and rejected. Independent studies have reinforced the opinion that the development of OIH is based on confounders including pain modality tested, route of drug administration and specific opioid in question.Improvements in paradoxical pain intensity upon discontinuation of opioid therapy suggests that a multidisciplinary method of pain relief is favoured for chronic-pain patients. Quantitative-sensory testing of pain is offered as the most appropriate way of diagnosing hyperalgesia. We can, thus far only reliably validate the existence of OIH development in normal human volunteers receiving acute-morphine infusions.
Analgesics, Opioid, Hyperalgesia, Animals, Humans, Drug Administration Schedule
Analgesics, Opioid, Hyperalgesia, Animals, Humans, Drug Administration Schedule
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 59 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
