Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Even-number Measurement Bias With Goldmann Applanation Tonometry

Authors: Anne Rozwat; Daniel K. Roberts; Daniel K. Roberts;

Even-number Measurement Bias With Goldmann Applanation Tonometry

Abstract

While working with a large data set of Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT) intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements for a separate investigation, we observed that the IOP distribution favored even-numbered values. Study of this phenomenon has been limited, and this larger data set enabled inquiry that showed new insight concerning the manner in which this bias may vary according to IOP level. This analysis of 69,537 right eyes measured via GAT demonstrated that even-number preference was essentially absent in the 21 to 24 mm Hg range, but then the bias gradually strengthened as it moved away from this range in a lower or higher IOP direction. These data suggest that there is an examiner proclivity to measure and/or record GAT readings as even-numbered values, but that this tendency varies depending on IOP level.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Adult, Aged, 80 and over, Male, Adolescent, Reproducibility of Results, Glaucoma, Middle Aged, Tonometry, Ocular, Bias, Humans, Female, Intraocular Pressure, Aged

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    4
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
4
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!