Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Pediatric surgical oncology

Authors: Eugene S. Wiener;

Pediatric surgical oncology

Abstract

This article highlights the surgeon's role in childhood cancer especially as it relates to local control of solid tumors, research, and surgical supportive care. There is a trend toward preresection chemotherapy, and rarely, radiotherapy. This may allow safer, less extensive, and function-preserving delayed resection in neuroblastoma, hepatoblastoma, bone tumors, and nephroblastoma in selected patients without negatively affecting outcome. Ultimately, complete resection for most tumors, even advanced neuroblastomas, significantly improves survival. Organ transplantation allows complete resection with good survival in children with otherwise nonresectable liver tumors. In non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, resection should not be attempted, except for localized disease and if complete resection is possible. Second-look procedures have limited value in lymphoma, but have an important role in germ cell tumors. The differentiation of typhlitis from appendicitis is critical in the neutropenic patient to avoid life-threatening complications. Studies of venous access devices show a clear benefit of totally implantable devices in preventing dislodgment and decreasing the rate of infection. Neuroblastoma models are fertile soil for research into tumor biology and novel treatment modalities. Surgeons continue to play crucial roles in childhood oncology.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Neuroblastoma, Carcinoma, Hepatocellular, Neoplasms, Liver Neoplasms, Rhabdomyosarcoma, Humans, Bone Neoplasms, Child, Wilms Tumor, Kidney Neoplasms

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    27
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
27
Average
Top 10%
Average
Related to Research communities
Cancer Research
Upload OA version
Are you the author? Do you have the OA version of this publication?