
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>pmid: 7058355
Sterilization reversal is performed more frequently since the innovation of microscopic technics in tubal surgery. We analyzed 40 consecutive cases of reversal of female sterilization performed at the Medical College of Georgia from 1973 through 1980. We used a temporary intraluminal 2-0 nylon splint. Microsurgical technic was used in 17 cases (43%) and macrosurgical, in 15 (37%). Other technics included unilateral microsurgical (2), unilateral macrosurgical (1), unilateral microsurgical and contralateral implantation (1), salpingostomy (1), Peterson implantation (2), and cornual implantation (1). Pregnancy rates (longer than three months follow-up) for the microsurgery group and macrosurgery group were 80% and 33%, respectively. The ectopic pregnancy rate was 15% for the entire group.
Microsurgery, Pregnancy, Sterilization, Tubal, 610, Humans, Female, Sterilization Reversal, Fallopian Tubes, Catheterization, Pregnancy, Ectopic
Microsurgery, Pregnancy, Sterilization, Tubal, 610, Humans, Female, Sterilization Reversal, Fallopian Tubes, Catheterization, Pregnancy, Ectopic
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 8 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
