Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Response of Cotton to Damage by Insect Pests in Australia: Compensation for Early Season Fruit Damage

Authors: K. D. Brook; A. B. Hearn; C. F. Kelly;

Response of Cotton to Damage by Insect Pests in Australia: Compensation for Early Season Fruit Damage

Abstract

Data were analysed from 24 experiments, done between 1984 and 1988 in the Namoi Valley of NSW, Australia, in which cotton crops were subjected to various amounts of damage. There were three sets of experiments: pest management on a research station, pest management on commercial farms, and manual disbudding. The okra-leafed variety Siokra was infested with fewer pests than the normal leaf ‘DP90’ and suffered less damage from a given density of pests. Both varieties compensated for early-season damage at low yield levels but not at high levels. The reduction in yield caused by damage at high yield levels was less in ‘Siokra’ than in ‘DP90’. Three physiological explanations for these effects are offered: (1) where low yield is caused by heavy physiological shedding of fruit resulting from adverse weather or agronomic practices, the shedding caused by pests can substitute for physiological shedding and thus insulate low-yielding crops from pest damage; (2) if the yield of the low-yielding crops is limited by the incomplete interception of radiation, then delaying the termination of the expansion of the canopy will increase yield; early damage can delay the onset of the metabolic stress that terminates expansion of the crop canopy by reducing the rate at which the fruit load increases; (3) loss of early fruit under some conditions conducive to high yield can cause rank growth, whose increased respiratory requirements may reduce the assimilate supply available to set and grow the extra bolls that could compensate for those lost. The implications of the results for pest management are discussed. Thresholds should not be raised above the lower end of their current range in Australia except in ‘Siokra’ crops, which are expected to yield <7.5 bales/hectare.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    28
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
28
Top 10%
Top 10%
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!