Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Evaluation of Oviposition Stimulants for Mass Production of Melon Fly, Oriental Fruit Fly, and Mediterranean Fruit Fly (Diptera: Tephritidae)

Authors: Roger Vargas; Harris B. Chang;

Evaluation of Oviposition Stimulants for Mass Production of Melon Fly, Oriental Fruit Fly, and Mediterranean Fruit Fly (Diptera: Tephritidae)

Abstract

Responses of Melon fly, Dacus cucurbitae Coquillett, oriental fruit fly, Dacus dorsalis Hendel, and Mediterranean fruit fly, Ceratitis capitata (Wiedemann), to artificial oviposition bottles treated with various liquids derived from host juices or extracts and water was tested in a choice test device. Harvest of D. cucurbitae eggs was 89.4% higher from oviposition bottles that contained the juice of pumpkin, Cucurbita maxima Duchesne, than from bottles with the juice of tomato, Lycopersicon esculentum Miller, the standard oviposition stimulant. Harvest of D. dorsalis eggs was 55.2% higher from oviposition bottles that contained juice of orange, Citrus sinensis (L.) Osbeck, than from bottles with juice of guava, Psidium guajava L., the standard oviposition stimulant. Harvest of C. capitata eggs from oviposition bottles that contained an extract of coffee, Coffea arabica L., was equal to those with the standard oviposition stimulant (water). Results indicate that host fruit juices with minimal commercial processing and without additives were the best oviposition stimulants. Findings are discussed in the context of oviposition stimulant evaluation procedures and mass production of tephritid fruit flies.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    18
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
18
Top 10%
Top 10%
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!