Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Abnormalities of Blood Coagulation Tests in Patients with Cancer

Authors: Richard L. Edwards; Frederick R. Rickles; Thomas E. Moritz; William G. Henderson; Leo R. Zacharski; Walter B. Forman; C. J. Cornell; +7 Authors

Abnormalities of Blood Coagulation Tests in Patients with Cancer

Abstract

Routine blood coagulation tests were performed on 431 consecutive patients enrolled in a study of the role of anticoagulation in cancer treatment (VA Cooperative Study #75). Two hundred sixteen control patients were treated with standard therapy, and 215 patients were treated with standard therapy plus sodium warfarin. At the time of entry into the study, the most common abnormalities were elevated fibrinogen levels, platelet counts, and fibrinopeptide A levels. Serial studies demonstrated a steady increase in platelet count and fibrinogen levels before death. Anticoagulation lowered FPA levels but had no significant effect on fibrinogen levels, platelet counts, or euglobulin clot lysis times. An unexpected finding was a dramatic increase in fibrin split product levels after institution of anticoagulation (means +/- SEM = 42.6 +/- 116.4 vs. 2.9 +/- 7.0 mg/L in control subjects; P less than 0.02). This study supports the presence of subclinical activation of blood coagulation in most patients with cancer. Moreover, the preferential activation of fibrinolysis in anticoagulated patients suggests a role for a vitamin K-dependent factor(s) in the regulation of fibrinolysis in patients with cancer.

Keywords

Cardiovascular Diseases, Platelet Count, Neoplasms, Thrombin, Fibrinogen, Humans, Blood Coagulation Tests, Warfarin, Fibrinopeptide A

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    167
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 1%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
167
Top 10%
Top 1%
Top 10%
Related to Research communities
Cancer Research
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!