
pmid: 8899444
Abstract Conventional wisdom suggests that those who assess healthcare processes and outcomes always should stratify cases by severity of illness; however, infection control personnel should analyze each quality assessment tool with and without severity adjustment and determine whether such adjustment is necessary. This article briefly reviews severity adjustments for diseases or procedures involving specific organ systems, as well as those applicable to all diseases, including the commercially available systems. Also discussed is whether and how these various systems for severity adjustment can be compared. Finally, the article will provide selected references for individuals who will use these scoring systems and need more information.
Heart Diseases, Comorbidity, Prognosis, Communicable Diseases, Risk Assessment, Severity of Illness Index, Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care, Health Status Indicators, Humans, Diagnosis-Related Groups, Neoplasm Staging
Heart Diseases, Comorbidity, Prognosis, Communicable Diseases, Risk Assessment, Severity of Illness Index, Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care, Health Status Indicators, Humans, Diagnosis-Related Groups, Neoplasm Staging
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 6 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
