
doi: 10.1086/597785
handle: 10919/49132
Molecular phylogenetics has revolutionized our understanding of the Caryophyllales, and yet many relationships have remained uncertain, particularly at deeper levels. We have performed parsimony and maximum likelihood analyses on separate and combined data sets comprising nine plastid genes (∼12,000 bp), two nuclear genes (∼5000 bp), and the plastid inverted repeat (∼24,000 bp), giving a combined analyzed length of 42,006 bp for 36 species of Caryophyllales and four outgroups. We have recovered strong support for deep‐level relationships across the order. Two major subclades are well supported, the noncore and core Caryophyllales; Rhabdodendron followed by Simmondsia are sisters to the core Caryophyllales, Limeum and Stegnosperma are successive sisters to the “globular inclusion” clade, Gisekia is a distinct lineage well separated from Rivina within the “raphide” clade, and Rivina and Phytolaccaceae are disparate lineages, with Rivina sister to Nyctaginaceae. The placement of Sarcobatus and relationships ...
580, 570, flowering plants, rbcl, character reconstruction, plant sciences, stochastic character mapping, evo-devo, petals, sequence data, portulacaceae, chloroplast, classification, mads-box, evolution, MADS-box, angiosperms, molecular phylogeny, 18s rdna
580, 570, flowering plants, rbcl, character reconstruction, plant sciences, stochastic character mapping, evo-devo, petals, sequence data, portulacaceae, chloroplast, classification, mads-box, evolution, MADS-box, angiosperms, molecular phylogeny, 18s rdna
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 107 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
